Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Rare diseases (RDs) collectively impact over 30 million people in Europe. Most individual conditions have a low prevalence which has resulted in a lack of research and expertise in this field, especially regarding genetic newborn screening (gNBS). There is increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating patients' needs and general public perspectives into the shared decision-making process regarding gNBS. This study is part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative project Screen4Care which aims at shortening the diagnostic journey for RDs by accelerating diagnosis for patients living with RDs through gNBS and the use of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our objective will be to assess expecting parent's perspectives, attitudes and preferences regarding gNBS for RDs in Italy and Germany. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed method approach will assess perspectives, attitudes and preferences of (1) expecting parents seeking genetic consultation and (2) 'healthy' expecting parents from the general population in two countries (Germany and Italy). Focus groups and interviews using the nominal group technique and ranking exercises will be performed (qualitative phase). The results will inform the treatment of attributes to be assessed via a survey and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The total recruitment sample will be 2084 participants (approximatively 1000 participants in each country for the online survey). A combination of thematic qualitative and logit-based quantitative approaches will be used to analyse the results of the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Erlangen University Ethics Committee (22-246_1-B), the Freiburg University Ethics Committee (23-1005 S1-AV) and clinical centres in Italy (University of FerraraCE: 357/2023/Oss/AOUFe and Hospedale Bambino Gesu: No.2997 of 2 November 2023, Prot. No. _902) and approved for data storage and handling at the Uppsala University (2022-05806-01). The dissemination of the results will be ensured via scientific journal publication (open access).

Clinical characteristics and somatic burden of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II with or without neurological involvement: An analysis from the Hunter Outcome Survey.

Approximately two-thirds of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) have neuronopathic disease, with central nervous system involvement; one-third have non-neuronopathic disease. This analysis of data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS) compared the clinical manifestations and surgical and nonsurgical procedure history in patients with neuronopathic or non-neuronopathic MPS II. Prospective patients were identified in July 2018 in HOS for inclusion in this analysis as those with stable cognitive impairment status as assessed at 10 years of age and at a minimum of one follow-up visit at 11 to <20 years of age. Patients were stratified according to cognitive impairment status at 10 years into neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic groups, and clinical manifestations and surgical and nonsurgical procedure history were compared between the two groups. In total, 193 patients had cognitive impairment status assessments available (at 10 years and 11 to <20 years of age), 151 of whom had stable cognitive impairment status and were included; 100/151 (66.2%) were in the neuronopathic group and 51/151 (33.8%) in the non-neuronopathic group. The proportion of patients demonstrating manifestations by system organ class and the number of surgical and nonsurgical procedures per patient were broadly comparable in the neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic groups both before and after patients' 10th birthdays. The most common manifestations before patients' 10th birthdays, including facial features, joint stiffness and limited function, and hepatomegaly were reported in >80% of patients in both groups. For the neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic groups, the median [10th percentile, 90th percentile] number of different types of surgical and nonsurgical procedures per patient (3 [1, 6] and 3 [1, 7], respectively) and of all procedures per patient (4 [1, 10] and 5 [2, 11], respectively) before patients' 10th birthdays were similar, although the type of procedure may have differed. Thus, in the first two decades of life, patients with non-neuronopathic disease were found to have similar somatic manifestations to those of the neuronopathic group and undergo procedures for complications as often as those with neuronopathic disease.

Ricin poisoning: a comprehensive review.

CONTEXT: The recent discoveries of ricin, a deadly biologic toxin, at a South Carolina postal facility, a White House mail facility, and a US senator's office has raised concerns among public health officials, physicians, and citizens. Ricin is one of the most potent and lethal substances known, particularly when inhaled. The ease with which the native plant (Ricinus communis) can be obtained and the toxin extracted makes ricin an attractive weapon. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the literature on ricin poisoning and provide recommendations based on our best professional judgment for clinicians and public health officials that are faced with deliberate release of ricin into the environment. LITERATURE ACQUISITION: Using PubMed, we searched MEDLINE and OLDMEDLINE databases (January 1950-August 2005). The Chemical and Biological Information Analysis Center database was searched for historical and military literature related to ricin toxicity. Book chapters, unpublished reports, monographs, relevant news reports, and Web material were also reviewed to find nonindexed articles. RESULTS: Most literature on ricin poisoning involves castor bean ingestion and experimental animal research. Aerosol release of ricin into the environment or adulteration of food and beverages are pathways to exposure likely to be exploited. Symptoms after ingestion (onset within 12 hours) are nonspecific and may include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain and may progress to hypotension, liver failure, renal dysfunction, and death due to multiorgan failure or cardiovascular collapse. Inhalation (onset of symptoms is likely within 8 hours) of ricin is expected to produce cough, dyspnea, arthralgias, and fever and may progress to respiratory distress and death, with few other organ system manifestations. Biological analytic methods for detecting ricin exposure are undergoing investigation and may soon be available through reference laboratories. Testing of environmental samples is available through federal reference laboratories. Currently, no antidote, vaccine, or other specific effective therapy is available for ricin poisoning or prevention. Prompt treatment with supportive care is necessary to limit morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Health care workers and public health officials should consider ricin poisoning in patients with gastrointestinal or respiratory tract illness in the setting a credible threat. Poison control centers and public health authorities should be notified of any known illness associated with ricin exposure.